Items
No. |
Item |
11. |
Declaration of Members' Interests
In accordance with
the Council’s Constitution, Members are asked to declare any
interest they may have in any matter which is to be considered at
this meeting.
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest.
|
12. |
Minutes (5 October 2022) PDF 85 KB
Minutes:
The minutes of the meeting held on 5 October
2022 were confirmed as correct.
|
13. |
Housing Regeneration PDF 369 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chief Planner (CP) at Be First delivered a
presentation on Housing Regeneration, which detailed:
·
Be First’s key strands of work;
·
The number of new homes consented since April 2019;
·
The number of new homes delivered since April 2019;
·
The pipeline of delivery in the Borough until 2037; and
·
The programmes of work within the Council and Be First’s
pipeline until 2027.
In response to questions from Members, the CP
and the Strategic Director Inclusive Growth (SDIG) stated that:
- “Turnkey” properties
related to those units acquired by Be First, that had been built by
other developers, with the reason for this being that other
developers could often build these units much more cheaply than Be
First. It also helped with the viability in terms of bringing these
schemes forward.
- As part of the planning negotiations
and up until the application was presented at the Council’s
Planning Committee, discussions would be held around education,
healthcare and transport infrastructure. Following the approval of
the application, there would also be a Section 106 (S106) agreement
attached to the approved planning permission, as well as the
planning conditions, which were the legal obligations in terms of
what the developer had committed to as part of the mitigations for
the proposed development. Developers were also charged a Community
Infrastructure Levy (CIL), which could be used by the Council to
support local infrastructure; however, there was a reduced fund in
the Borough due to the high level of affordable housing, with
developers not required to pay the CIL if they built such
housing.
- With the Local Plan, the Council and
Be First had an Infrastructure Delivery Plan which outlined the
different types of infrastructure, such as cycle infrastructure and
healthcare hubs. This document set the expectation of what would
need to come forward as part of developments, to mitigate their
effects.
- Part of the Council and Be
First’s placemaking strategy when they worked with new
developers was to think about the design of the place, which looked
at all of the infrastructure needed.
- Whilst the Council and Be First were
waiting for clarification as to cladding and building regulations,
their schemes were built to current planning and building control
regulations. Building control had become tighter and the Council
and Be First had a good relationship with the Fire Brigade.
- There was work being undertaken with
Reside in terms of affordability, and in the current economic
climate, in terms of viability. There were currently weekly
meetings on this, where the Council and Reside were reviewing what
was being built, the cost and understanding of what needed to be
slowed down or paused. Several conversations had taken place with
the Greater London Authority (GLA) around the Council receiving
more grants for construction.
- Residents who were looking to move
into Reside properties received an information pack; as part of
this, they would be informed about parking arrangements and that
they would be taking on these properties, without parking spaces.
The SDIG would ensure that the Managing Director of Reside,
...
view the full minutes text for item 13.
|
14. |
Economic Infrastructure PDF 64 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Deputy Development Director (DDD) at Be
First delivered a presentation on the economic infrastructure that
was being delivered in the Borough, which detailed:
- The Be First mission, which was to
accelerate regeneration in the Borough, so that no-one was left
behind;
- The Transformation Areas and
Aspiration Zones within the Borough, which had huge potential for
growth and to provide opportunities for residents;
- Examples of regeneration within the
Borough, which were creating jobs for residents, such as Dagenham
East, Eastbrook Studios and Dagenham Dock;
- Examples of regeneration within the
Borough, which had provided workspaces and event venues (such as
the “Make It London” space), as well as artistry space
and accommodation (such as the “House for
Artists”);
- Future commercial-led mixed-use
schemes, such as the Factory District;
- Future industrial schemes and
concepts, including innovative stacked industrial units;
- The Good Food Economy Partnership,
which would build a wider movement for good food that supported
residents to grow, cook, eat, share and enjoy good food, as well as
develop the reputation of Barking town centre as London’s new
food destination;
- The Thames Freeport;
- The Barking Town Centre Regeneration
Strategy 2020-2030;
- Plans to transform the Vicarage
Field Shopping Centre into a mixed-use scheme, combining retail,
education, health, food and drink and residential facilities;
- Barking Station improvement
plans;
- The Food Hub, which would uplift
Barking’s food and beverage offer; and
- The “levelling-up” bid
for Dagenham Heathway.
The Head of Transport Infrastructure and
Policy Planning (HTIPP) at Be First then delivered a presentation
on the Transport Growth Programme, which outlined:
- How growth could be unlocked through
transport, highlighting the positive impact of initiatives such as
Electric Vehicle (EV) charging points, cycle training and improved
bus lanes for the Borough;
- Key focus areas for growth, as set
out in the Local Plan;
- Transport Priorities set out in the
Local Plan;
- Key initiatives that had already
been delivered, such as the Barking Riverside Overground Station
and the Barking Riverside Pier;
- Plans for “levelling-up”
bids in Dagenham Heathway and Barking Town Centre;
- Cycling improvements;
- Key safety schemes for delivery in
2023;
- Bus improvement priority schemes for
2023;
- Work to improve the Borough’s
rail stations and connectivity;
- A13 junction improvement work;
and
- Funding information for schemes and
works planned.
In response to questions from Members, the
HTIPP and the DDD stated that:
·
Most of the complaints received around TfL related to bus delays;
whilst there had not been a lot of complaints received about the
level of service, the HTIPP encouraged Members to raise these with
him where these did occur. The capacity and issues at Barking
Station were currently on TfL’s risk list in terms of new
infrastructure schemes that they needed to address, to improve the
service at that station, which was the ninth busiest in the UK. Be
First also wanted to continue to work with TfL to improve services
in East London. The SDIG echoed that whilst East London had
previously not received as good a transport offer as the rest of
London, Be First and ...
view the full minutes text for item 14.
|
15. |
Work Programme PDF 76 KB
Minutes:
The Chair informed the Committee of the
following changes that had been made to the Work Programme since
the last meeting, which was agreed by the Committee:
·
The ‘Readiness for Children’s Social Care OFSTED
inspection’ report, which was due to come to the 7 December
Committee, would need to be postponed to the 8 March 2023
Committee, to align with updated timescales for this and with the
timetabling for various Member groups.
·
The 8 March 2023 Net Zero item would be held as a wider
Member’s Briefing to accommodate the above change in
timetabling, as well as to enable all 51 Councillors to attend this
and learn more about the Council’s net zero initiatives.
It was discussed that going forward, some of
the Committee’s items may be best delivered as Member’s
Briefings, due to how busy the Committee was and to enable it to
make best use of its time, as well as to enable specific items to
be more informative, with all 51 Councillors able to learn about
these.
|