The Council’s Programme Manager for
Revenues and Benefits (PM) delivered a presentation on the current
arrangements for Appointeeship and
Deputyship within the Council, as well as the plans to implement a
Deputyship service from December 2021 to sit alongside the current
Appointeeship Council service. Both
services were in place to support residents without the capacity to
manage their own finances, or who did not have a family member
willing to conduct these matters on their behalf, but whilst the
Appointeeship service was limited to
small amounts of money and every day financial matters, the
Deputyship service could encompass all aspects of financial matters
(depending on Court of Protection (COP) directives).
In response to questions from Members, the PM
stated that:
- The current annual charge for
residents to use the Council’s Appointeeship service was just over £400,
which equated to £8 per week.
- Many residents using the
Council’s Appointeeship service
did have family members, but for various reasons, and in the best
interests of their relatives, they chose for an independent person
to provide this financial support. This was also likely to occur
with the new Deputyship service. In the case of deputyships, many
family members often opted to spend valuable time with their
relatives, rather than having to worry about their financial
administration.
- In some cases, family members
preferred to take on the responsibility of their relatives’
financial affairs. However, some then struggled with the difficult
nature of this role and opted for the Deputyship service at a later
point.
- If a resident using the Deputyship
service passed away, the Council would settle their estate and
arrange their funeral. Whenever the Council took on a new
appointeeship or deputyship, it would
always try to ensure that a will was in place, so that the wishes
of the individual could be fulfilled. The service would aim to
liaise with family members and the Adult’s Care and Support
(ACS) team as soon as possible around this.
- If possible, the Council would
liaise with the resident themselves around their will, as they may
still have the capacity to express their wishes for their assets or
estate, even if they lacked capacity to manage their financial
affairs more generally. In many cases, residents also had advocates
or family members who were able to help them make these decisions
without any kind of coercion. However, if officers suspected
coercion, they could refer to colleagues in the adult safeguarding
team for advice or intervention.
- If a resident was not using the
Council’s Appointeeship or
Deputyship service, their family member was withholding their
finances, and if the resident was known to the ACS team, ACS would
make an assessment. If ACS believed that the resident was unable to
look after their financial affairs and that their family was not
dealing with their affairs appropriately, then ACS would step in to
try to resolve the situation. In some cases, ACS could also apply
for an order from the Court of Protection, without the approval of
the family members, if the team had evidence of neglect or abuse of
the individual. The Operational Director (OD) for ACS also stated
that ACS would look into safeguarding
proceedings, to ensure that the resident was safe, their rent was
paid and there was no risk of homelessness.
- Appointeeships were smaller and less complicated
than deputyships, with two members of staff currently dealing with
95 appointeeships. Deputyships were
more complicated, especially if there was a house, large amounts of
capital or shares involved. From December 2021, the Council would
be looking to deal with a blend of up to 150 appointeeships and deputyships. It would likely
convert some of the current appointeeships to deputyships, allowing for the
capacity to take on up to another 50 deputyships if needed. It
could also offer the services of the team outside of the Council,
for example, to other councils who may be struggling with the
volume of their clients.
- Each resident had their own bank
account and their own set of bills, which would be reconciled
on a monthly basis, and the Council had
to compile an annual report for deputyship for the Office of the
Public Guardian. It also ensured that the Internal Audit team got
sight of performance early on, as part of their calendar of
work.
The Chair praised the decision to establish a
Deputyship service for residents who were no longer able to manage
their own finances, noting that this could also prove beneficial
for elderly parents who wanted to ensure that their vulnerable
children were adequately supported,
before their passing.